Lessons from the Ryder Cup
If you follow golf closely you likely watched the Ryder Cup
last weekend. If you do not watch golf, stay with me anyway- because last week’s
competition was ripe with lessons on leadership. Part of what makes the Ryder Cup a magnificent event is that
a great captain can galvanize and energize his team so that every player would
do anything for that captain to win. You probably feel the same way about great
leaders that you have or currently work for.
What happens when
the opposite is true? What happens when a
leader’s well intentioned approach is disconnected to the needs of their team?
Pairings in a Ryder Cup become a hot topic because the event
transforms a highly individual sport into a cooperative effort. The captains of
the U.S.A. and European squads must consider playing styles and personalities for
their lineups. The captains become the center of attention.
However, other
than the Ryder Cup and some other selected events, professional golfers enjoy a
great deal of autonomy and largely decide themselves [or with their caddy] how
to plan for and play the course over a tournament. They are not looking to a
captain to make those decisions on their behalf. They simply play a round or
tournament in less strokes than their competitors and they win, regardless of how
they got to that outcome.
As I watched some of the
post-match evaluation it was interesting to hear players report that the
TeamUSA Captain, Tom Watson took a more hands-off leadership approach. Rather
than discussing the possible pairings with his players or asking for their
views, he allowed his vice captains to assign the pairings. Professional
golfers are not used to being managed in a hierarchical way. Mr. Watson’s
choice to distance himself from the players in his style of leadership probably
seemed like the best approach to him at the time. However, it did not produce
the results he was hoping for.
TeamUSAs
leaders did not use a collaborative approach and did not solicit the opinions
of the individual player’s thoughts on pairings. One can speculate that the leadership style
that was employed is counter to the culture that a professional golfer typically
experiences and would expect. Perhaps
they needed imapMyTeam.
The tale of
the 2014 Ryder Cup plays out in business regularly. Leaders change, the new
leader brings a style that may be their own and plays to their strengths, but
does not work in the culture and environment for the team. If that leader is
unaware, unable or unwilling to adapt to the needs of the team, that team,
despite all of its talent and all of its strategies, will likely fall short of
its goals.
Adaptive leadership combined with
team execution puts you in a position to win every time.
imapMyTeam® is designed to enable ‘willing’ leaders to adapt
their behaviors to fully inspire and engage the talents of the team against the
demands of the competition.